Io, voglio una vita tranquilla la la the ...
Securities not read the newspapers tomorrow:
Law discovered the new system of incentives based on . It's not like it.
Agenda
1. Communications from the Dean.
2. Communications Representatives at the Board of Library Orientation, Presidium President ITGM, Erasmus / Socrates.
3. Educational organization (especially with regard to the contribution student of the University of Trento).
4. Measures students.
5. Any other business.
6. Measures professors and researchers.
1. Communications from the Dean.
Nothing important, up, go to step 3.
2. Communications Representatives at the Board of Library Orientation, Presidium President ITGM, Erasmus / Socrates.
More ...
3. Educational organization (especially with regard to the contribution student of the University of Trento).
AAAHHHH! Now he thinks that.
The Faculty Council today, 16 July 2008 should have been held last Wednesday, shortly after graduation. Yesterday, Tuesday, July 15, took the Senate where they have been "ratified" the parameters of merit provided by the Joint University . That is, the parameters responsible for its unwanted waxes Reform.
The Dean was convinced that the parameters of merit should have been established by the Faculty. Imagine the surprise when I arrived yesterday in the Academic Senate and discovers that the latest version of the Faculty to do is to establish a good thing ... (Note: the Faculty remained very little already several months ago, but the Dean did not know)
After hours of negotiations in the Academic Senate, the Dean è riuscito a ottenere una nuova suddivisione dei punti di merito. Non ho il documento aggiornato (ultima versione 9.0). La versione che ho io è quella che ci è stata inviata lunedì per il Consiglio di Facoltà, cioè quella antecedente alla modifica del Senato.
Eccola qui .
Immaginate che in quel documento, da qualche parte, ci sono i 10 punti (su 120) che saranno stabiliti dalla Facoltà.
Ma come saranno dati questi punti? La discussione di oggi avrebbe dovuto vertere solo su questo.
Premessa: la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza non era stata mai contattata dall'Ateneo. Mai un parere richiesto, mai un chiarimento dato. Come si fa a parlare di un aspetto minimo, marginale the Reformation, when you have been bypassed on the rest?
The debate opened with the frontal attack by the Dean of the ordinary. Because he had voted in favor of the Reformation in the Academic Senate, because he had never convened a Faculty Council to discuss it, because he had allowed the faculty were denied the right to decide on the future of education.
followed by other actions in which this reform was dismantled piece by piece by the teachers. The approval of the Reformation
Cerea wonderful thing is: nobody wants, at least from this year. All (or nearly) voted for, starting this year. It was postponed
approval of the parameters for the allocation of those 10 merit points (out of 120) in September, because no one had liked those proposed by the Presidency.
My speech? Here it is:
" The Dean does not have all the faults. Even the Rector knew the real extent of these reforms, nor the" bug "that led. The overall design was only possible to see the end. The approval was made small steps, each necessary to improve the previous situation. But every one led to the Reformation Ceredigion. "
Frost.
The idea that I have done is as follows:
Teachers who at first endorsed this reform (among other the Dean of Law and Rector) belong to a generation who fought for the right to study and social redemption through the University. It 'a generation that thought of opening the University to all, allowing everyone to study and social redemption. The universities that see now is different. We all come, do not love the study, we passively accept the terms. They shared the desire to give a jolt to the system. The Reformation Ceredigion has fulfilled their wish.
Now students will be "encouraged" to be active, alert, happy and productive.
I love the law and economics. But I understand what the limits of a system that wants to "love study ", and paid.
the presentation of research" maintenance costs of the Students of the University of Trento "I said that it is important for the accountability of students, but there is a threshold beyond which it becomes" the commodification of the study ".
The commodification made by the Reform Cerea sogllia does not see it even as he passed. The university pays those who behave in a certain way. The University has determined that that way is right. Amen.
4. Measures students.
read that again? Stop it, is over.
5. Any other business.
In fact there is one thing. Next year sarà presente nella guida dello studente un riquadro con la spiegazione di come si calcola la media ponderata.
6. Provvedimenti docenti e ricercatori.
Non siamo ammessi alla discussione.
Jus quia justum o justum quia jus ?
Con questa domanda impegnativa si conclude l'ultimo racconto dell'ultimo Consiglio di Facoltà prima delle vacanze estive. Have fun!
se serve: valerio.scollo@studenti.unitn.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment